Home/About Sanrui and the working method
Next: review the method

Background and working method

A classical method should withstand questions before it guides a modern decision.

Sanrui is shaped by two long lines of practice: more than twenty years in traditional culture consulting and the systems discipline of an engineer. Xuan Kong, Zi Wei and Yi Ce retain their own classical logic, then enter a clear structure of question, evidence, conditions, action and review.

20+ years

Traditional culture consulting and study

A continuing practice of reading, application and review, not a short course or marketing label.

Engineer

5W1H, fishbone and 8D thinking

Used to define the issue, trace possible causes, sequence action and examine feedback.

Three methods

Xuan Kong, Zi Wei and Yi Ce keep distinct roles

Place, life stage and live decisions are not collapsed into one vague reading.

Written output

Reasoning, action and review remain available

Clients can return to what was known, inferred and still uncertain at the time.

Chart logic, site evidence and action notes remain distinct so the reasoning can be revisited.
Chart logic, site evidence and action notes remain distinct so the reasoning can be revisited.
Two lines of practice

Engineering methods clarify the problem. They do not turn a classical reading into scientific proof.

Traditional methods provide an observational structure. Systems analysis organizes facts, constraints, priorities and feedback. They can work side by side without confusing evidence levels or presenting correlation as scientific causation.

How Sanrui works

Every formal review must answer six questions.

These questions do not remove all uncertainty. They reduce unsupported certainty and show the client what is known, inferred and still open.

1. Scope

What decision is this review meant to support?

Separate the main question from background, emotion and secondary concerns.

2. Evidence

What is known, reported or still missing?

Label birth data, facing, photographs, contracts, accounts and event timelines by source.

3. Classical basis

Which chart relationship supports the interpretation?

State the palace, transformation, direction, flying star, symbol or strength relation being used.

4. Real-world match

How does the chart relate to people, place and events?

Test the reading against roles, resources, constraints and dated changes.

5. Action

What moves first and what should wait?

Prefer low-risk, reversible steps with responsibility and stop conditions.

6. Review

What result would support or weaken the reading?

Revisit the agreed dates and indicators without explaining every outcome as a success.

How the method formed

The classical system is not repackaged as management science. Each discipline keeps its own responsibility.

Sanrui preserves the internal order of traditional methods while using habits from engineering projects to make advisory work clearer and more accountable.

Long practice

Each method must first stand on its own rules

Xuan Kong examines direction, period and active openings; Zi Wei examines palaces, transformations and timing; Yi Ce examines actors, strength and the live moment.

Engineering discipline

Complex issues are framed before causes are claimed

5W1H completes the fact base, fishbone analysis explores possible causes, and 8D structures measures, ownership and review.

Advisory output

The work returns to the client’s current decision

Depth is measured by a clear main cause, usable action and honest limits, not by the number of technical terms.

Boundaries that support trust

Some limits should be stated before any engagement begins.

No guaranteed outcome

No promise of certain wealth, promotion, reconciliation, payment or success.

No professional substitution

Medical, legal, investment, structural and engineering decisions remain with qualified professionals.

No invented evidence

Public cases remove identifying details; private follow-up is not presented as a verified result without permission.

No hidden uncertainty

Missing birth time, direction or key documents lowers the level of specificity and is stated directly.

How a client can verify fit

Use four questions before deciding whether Sanrui suits your needs.

01

Can I see how a conclusion is formed?

The method and full cases show the main chain from evidence and chart logic to action.

02

Can I see what I will receive?

The deliverables page shows written report structure, action lists, review points and scenario-specific samples.

03

Can I see what the service does not cover?

The scope page states medical, legal, investment and engineering boundaries.

04

Can I submit the issue before choosing a method?

Yes. Begin with the main question and available evidence; the initial review matches scope and depth.

Sources and evidence

The source map and evidence states are open for review.

See which materials guide the classical reading, which tools structure the investigation and where uncertainty remains.

Sources and evidence

Continue reading

Read the method and cases before deciding on a formal review.

Do not decide from a slogan. Examine how Sanrui states its basis, handles uncertainty and structures the deliverable.

English HomeRequest Review